Success Story · Project Development
37 variants in 3 weeks: Swiss Property decides the construction method for 130 apartments based on data.
37variants compared
3 weeksinstead of several months
4construction methods compared side by side
The starting point
For the feasibility study of the Niederscherli development, Swiss Property had to decide which construction method delivers the best overall package: cost, CO₂, energy and comfort together, not just one criterion.
The result
- Four construction methods compared on the architectural model: masonry, ventilated masonry, reinforced concrete and timber, directly from 4 digital models with 22 defined component types.
- Every variant assessed holistically: greenhouse gas emissions, heating demand, cost and summer thermal protection as a dynamic simulation.
- The best variant decided after 3 weeks, instead of several months.
Beyond the project
- 1Before acquisitionSpot potential early
Feasibility studies can be checked for cost, energy, CO₂ and comfort before the purchase.
- 2Up to the construction decisionOne model, every phase
The chosen variant is reassessed automatically with every new design stage, without starting from scratch.
- 3PortfolioLearn from every project
Construction methods and key figures become comparable across all projects, and the knowledge flows into the next one.
«Thanks to vyzn, a short sprint is enough to compare component costs, life cycle assessments and energy consumption across different materialization options. vyzn provides purely analytical foundations for decision-making.»